| Non-Regression: Opening the Door to Solving the ‘Copenhagen Dilemma’? All the Eyes on Case C-896/19 Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru M Leloup, D Kochenov, A Dimitrovs RECONNECT Working Paper (Leuven) No. 15, 2021 | 19 | 2021 |
| The principle of the best interests of the child in the expulsion case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Procedural rationality as a remedy for inconsistency M Leloup Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 37 (1), 50-68, 2019 | 16 | 2019 |
| The appointment of judges and the right to a tribunal established by law: The ECJ tightens its grip on issues of domestic judicial organization: Review Simpson M Leloup Common Market Law Review 57 (4), 2020 | 11 | 2020 |
| An uncertain first step in the field of judicial self-government: ECJ 19 November 2019, joined cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18, AK, CP and DO M Leloup European Constitutional Law Review 16 (1), 145-169, 2020 | 10 | 2020 |
| The concept of structural human rights in the European Convention on Human Rights M Leloup Human Rights Law Review 20 (3), 480-501, 2020 | 9 | 2020 |
| Sometimes Even Easy Rule of Law Cases Make Bad Law: ECtHR (GC) 15 March 2022, No. 43572/18, Grzęda v Poland M Leloup, D Kosař European Constitutional Law Review 18 (4), 753-779, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
| Not just a simple civil servant: the right of access to a court of judges in the recent case law of the ECtHR M Leloup European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 4 (1), 23-57, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| Who Safeguards the Guardians? A Subjective Right of Judges to their Independence under Article 6 (1) ECHR M Leloup European Constitutional Law Review 17 (3), 394-421, 2021 | 4 | 2021 |
| Non-Regression: Opening the Door to Solving the “Copenhagen Dilemma”? All Eyes on Case C-896/19 Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru’(2021) M Leloup, D Kochenov, A Dimitrovs European Law Review 46, 668, 0 | 4 | |
| Separation of powers and alternative dispute resolution before the European Court of Human Rights C Jenart, M Leloup European Constitutional Law Review 15 (2), 247-271, 2019 | 3 | 2019 |
| Judicial self-government in de Belgische rechtsorde: over rechterlijke onafhankelijkheid, rechterlijke verantwoordelijkheid en de scheiding der machten M Leloup Tijdschrift voor bestuurswetenschappen en publiekrecht.-Brussel, 1951 …, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| The ECtHR Steps into the Ring M Leloup Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
| Repubblika: Anything new under the Maltese Sun?: The ECJ rules on the system of the appointment of judges in Malta M Leloup Verfassungsblog, 2021 | 2 | 2021 |
| Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson: the right to a tribunal established by law expanded to the appointment of judges M Leloup Strasbourg Observers, 2020 | 2 | 2020 |
| The untapped potential of the systemic criterion in the ECJ’s case law on judicial independence M Leloup German Law Journal 24 (6), 995-1010, 2023 | 1 | 2023 |
| The Duty to Exhaust Remedies with Systemic Deficiencies M Leloup Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
| Dolińska-Ficek t. Polen (EHRM, 49868/19)–Ook Bijzondere Kamer en Burgerlijke Kamer van Poolse Hooggerechtshof doorstaan toets EHRM niet M Leloup European Human Rights Cases Updates, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
| Saying Less is Sometimes More (even in Rule-of-Law Cases): Grzęda v Poland M Leloup, D Kosar EU Law Live, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
| Opening the door to solving the" Copenhagen dilemma"? All eyes on Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru M Leloup, D Kochenov, A Dimitrovs European law review 46 (5), 692-703, 2021 | 1 | 2021 |
| The impact of the fundamental rights case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice on the domestic separation of powers M Leloup University of Antwerp, 2021 | 1 | 2021 |
