Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study CE Mercer, P Hogg, R Lawson, J Diffey, ERE Denton The British journal of radiology 86 (1022), 20110596, 2013 | 80 | 2013 |
Practitioner compression force variation in mammography: A 6-year study CE Mercer, P Hogg, K Szczepura, ERE Denton Radiography 19 (3), 200-206, 2013 | 55 | 2013 |
A 6-year study of mammographic compression force: Practitioner variability within and between screening sites CE Mercer, K Szczepura, J Kelly, SR Millington, ERE Denton, R Borgen, ... Radiography 21 (1), 68-73, 2015 | 48 | 2015 |
Digital mammography P Hogg, J Kelly, C Mercer Springer 1, 1-307, 2015 | 48 | 2015 |
The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full‐field digital mammography units IHR Hauge, P Hogg, K Szczepura, P Connolly, G McGill, C Mercer Medical physics 39 (1), 263-271, 2012 | 40 | 2012 |
The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full‐field digital mammography units IHR Hauge, P Hogg, K Szczepura, P Connolly, G McGill, C Mercer Medical physics 39 (1), 263-271, 2012 | 40 | 2012 |
Pressure and breast thickness in mammography—an exploratory calibration study P Hogg, M Taylor, K Szczepura, C Mercer, E Denton The British journal of radiology 86 (1021), 20120222-20120222, 2013 | 27 | 2013 |
Effective lifetime radiation risk for a number of national mammography screening programmes R Ali, A England, MF McEntee, CE Mercer, A Tootell, P Hogg Radiography 24 (3), 240-246, 2018 | 19 | 2018 |
Does elevating image receptor increase breast receptor footprint and improve pressure balance? H Smith, K Szczepura, C Mercer, A Maxwell, P Hogg Radiography 21 (4), 359-363, 2015 | 17 | 2015 |
Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography RMKM Ali, A England, C Mercer, A Tootell, L Walton, W Schaake, P Hogg European Journal of Radiology 96, 98-103, 2017 | 16 | 2017 |
Does an increase in compression force really improve visual image quality in mammography?–An initial investigation CE Mercer, P Hogg, S Cassidy, ERE Denton Radiography 19 (4), 363-365, 2013 | 16 | 2013 |
The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography AK Abdullah, J Kelly, JD Thompson, CE Mercer, R Aspin, P Hogg The British Journal of Radiology 90 (1075), 20160871, 2017 | 14 | 2017 |
Mixed messages: An evaluation of NHS Trust social media policies in the north west of England B Scragg, S Shaikh, L Robinson, C Mercer Radiography 23 (3), 235-241, 2017 | 12 | 2017 |
Analysis of motion during the breast clamping phase of mammography WKE Ma, MF McEntee, C Mercer, J Kelly, S Millington, P Hogg The British journal of radiology 89 (1059), 20150715, 2016 | 11 | 2016 |
Does high EI make for good leaders? S Mackay, J Pearson, P Hogg, T Fawcett, C Mercer Imaging & Therapy Practice, 22, 2010 | 10 | 2010 |
Digital mammography: A holistic approach C Mercer, P Hogg, J Kelly Springer Nature, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
Examining the effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis D Mizzi, C Allely, F Zarb, J Kelly, P Hogg, M McEntee, A England, ... European journal of radiology 154, 110416, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
An exploration of mammographers' attitudes towards the use of social media for providing breast screening information to clients B Scragg, S Shaikh, G Shires, JS Hodgins, C Mercer, L Robinson, J Wray Radiography 23 (3), 249-255, 2017 | 9 | 2017 |
The role of the advanced clinical practitioner in breast diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature A Spacey, V Hipperson, A Gloster, C Mercer Radiography 27 (2), 654-662, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
A comparative study of pain experienced during successive mammography examinations in patients with a family history of breast cancer and those who have had breast cancer surgery DJ Nelson, A England, M Cheptoo, CE Mercer Radiography 26 (1), 76-81, 2020 | 7 | 2020 |