Ivar R. Hannikainen
Ivar R. Hannikainen
Other namesIvar Rodríguez Hannikainen, Ivar Hannikainen
Department of Philosophy I, University of Granada
Verified email at - Homepage
Cited by
Cited by
Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy
F Cova, B Strickland, A Abatista, A Allard, J Andow, M Attie, J Beebe, ...
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12, 9-44, 2021
Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm
RM Miller, IR Hannikainen, FA Cushman
Emotion 14 (3), 573-587, 2014
Nothing at stake in knowledge
D Rose, E Machery, S Stich, M Alai, A Angelucci, R Berniūnas, EE Buchtel, ...
Noûs 53 (1), 224-247, 2019
Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible?
IR Hannikainen, E Machery, FA Cushman
Cognition 170, 95-101, 2018
The Gettier intuition from South America to Asia
E Machery, S Stich, D Rose, M Alai, A Angelucci, R Berniūnas, EE Buchtel, ...
Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (3), 517-541, 2017
For whom does determinism undermine moral responsibility? Surveying the conditions for free will across cultures
IR Hannikainen, E Machery, D Rose, S Stich, CY Olivola, P Sousa, ...
Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2019
Act versus impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment
IR Hannikainen, RM Miller, FA Cushman
Ratio 30 (4), 462-493, 2017
An experimental guide to vehicles in the park
N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen, G Almeida
Judgment and Decision Making 15 (3), 312-329, 2020
Experimental philosophical bioethics
BD Earp, J Demaree-Cotton, M Dunn, V Dranseika, JAC Everett, A Feltz, ...
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (1), 30-33, 2020
Fuller and the Folk: The Inner Morality of Law Revisited
R Donelson, IR Hannikainen
Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy 3, 6-28, 2020
Experimental Philosophical Bioethics and Normative Inference
BD Earp, J Lewis, V Dranseika, IR Hannikainen
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 42, 91-111, 2021
Gender Stereotypes Underlie Child Custody Decisions
LLF Costa, ABD Esteves, R Kreimer, N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen
European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (3), 548-559, 2019
Whose Words Hurt? Contextual Determinants of Offensive Speech
M Almagro, IR Hannikainen, N Villanueva
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 48 (6), 937-953, 2022
The folk concept of law: Law is intrinsically moral
B Flanagan, IR Hannikainen
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1), 165-179, 2022
Are There Cross-Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law
IR Hannikainen, KP Tobia, GFCF de Almeida, R Donelson, V Dranseika, ...
Cognitive Science 45 (8), 2021
How Do People Use ‘Killing’, ‘Letting Die’ and Related Bioethical Concepts? Contrasting Descriptive and Normative Hypotheses
D Rodríguez-Arias, BR López, A Monasterio-Astobiza, IR Hannikainen
Bioethics 34 (5), 509-518, 2020
Rule is a dual character concept
G Almeida, N Struchiner, IR Hannikainen
Cognition 230 (4), 2023
Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism
IR Hannikainen, KP Tobia, GFCF de Almeida, N Struchiner, M Kneer, ...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (44), 2022
The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system
H Viciana, IR Hannikainen, A Gaitan Torres
PloS one 14 (7), e0219509, 2019
De Pulchritudine non est Disputandum? A cross‐cultural investigation of the alleged intersubjective validity of aesthetic judgment
F Cova, CY Olivola, E Machery, S Stich, D Rose, M Alai, A Angelucci, ...
Mind & Language 34 (3), 317-338, 2019
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20