Just Relationships HDA Dorfman Columbia Law Review 116, 1395, 2016 | 180* | 2016 |
The case against privatization A Dorfman, A Harel Philosophy & Public Affairs 41 (1), 67-102, 2013 | 64 | 2013 |
Private ownership A Dorfman Legal Theory 16 (1), 1-35, 2010 | 60 | 2010 |
Interpersonal human rights H Dagan, A Dorfman Cornell Int'l LJ 51, 361, 2018 | 57 | 2018 |
Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus A Dorfman University of Toronto Law Journal 61 (3), 467-520, 2011 | 52 | 2011 |
Private ownership and the standing to say so A Dorfman University of Toronto Law Journal 64 (3), 402-441, 2014 | 46 | 2014 |
Just Relationships’(2016) H Dagan, A Dorfman Colum L Rev 116, 1395, 0 | 45 | |
Against privatisation as such A Dorfman, A Harel Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2), 400-427, 2016 | 38 | 2016 |
Justice in Private: Beyond the rawlsian framework H Dagan, A Dorfman Law and Philosophy 37, 171-201, 2018 | 30 | 2018 |
The human right to private property H Dagan, A Dorfman Theoretical Inquiries in Law 18 (2), 391-416, 2017 | 29 | 2017 |
The Normativity of the Private Ownership Form A Dorfman The Modern Law Review 75 (6), 981-1009, 2012 | 29 | 2012 |
Freedom of Religion A Dorfman Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 21 (2), 279-319, 2008 | 27 | 2008 |
What is the Point of the Tort Remedy? A Dorfman The American Journal of Jurisprudence 55 (1), 105-162, 2010 | 26 | 2010 |
Substantive remedies H Dagan, A Dorfman Notre Dame L. Rev. 96, 513, 2020 | 24 | 2020 |
Private Law Exceptionalism? Part II: A Basic Difficulty with the Argument from Formal Equality A Dorfman Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 31 (1), 5-32, 2018 | 21 | 2018 |
The society of property A Dorfman University of Toronto Law Journal 62 (4), 563-607, 2012 | 21 | 2012 |
Private Ownership’(2010) A Dorfman Legal Theory 16, 1, 0 | 20 | |
The fault of trespass A Dorfman, A Jacob University of Toronto Law Journal 65 (1), 48-98, 2015 | 18 | 2015 |
Freedom of Religion”(2008) A Dorfman Can JL & Juris 21, 279, 0 | 18 | |
Private Law Exceptionalism? Part I: A Basic Difficulty with the Structural Arguments from Bipolarity and Civil Recourse A Dorfman Law and Philosophy 35 (2), 165-191, 2016 | 16 | 2016 |