| Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average. Research Report No. 2008-5. JL Kobrin, BF Patterson, EJ Shaw, KD Mattern, SM Barbuti College Board, 2008 | 604 | 2008 |
| Validity of the SAT® for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average. Research Report No. 2008-5. JL Kobrin, BF Patterson, EJ Shaw, KD Mattern, SM Barbuti College Board, 2008 | 600 | 2008 |
| Differential Validity, Differential Prediction, and College Admission Testing: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis. Research Report No. 2001-6. JW Young College Entrance Examination Board, 2001 | 225 | 2001 |
| Differential Validity and Prediction of the SAT®. Research Report No. 2008-4. KD Mattern, BF Patterson, EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin, SM Barbuti College Board, 2008 | 175 | 2008 |
| A Historical View of Subgroup Performance Differences on the SAT Reasoning Test™. Research Report No. 2006-5. JL Kobrin, V Sathy, EJ Shaw College Board, 2007 | 102 | 2007 |
| SAT Benchmarks: Development of a College Readiness Benchmark and Its Relationship to Secondary and Postsecondary School Performance. Research Report 2011-5. J Wyatt, J Kobrin, A Wiley, WJ Camara, N Proestler College Board, 2011 | 90 | 2011 |
| Describing students involved in the search phase of the college choice process: A cluster analysis study EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin, SF Packman, AE Schmidt Journal of Advanced Academics 20 (4), 662-700, 2009 | 79 | 2009 |
| Advanced Placement® Exam-Taking and Performance: Relationships with First-Year Subject Area College Grades. Research Report No. 2011-4. BF Patterson, S Packman, JL Kobrin College Board, 2011 | 65 | 2011 |
| Validity of the SAT for Predicting FYGPA: 2007 SAT Validity Sample. Statistical Report No. 2009-1. BF Patterson, KD Mattern, JL Kobrin College Board, 2009 | 58 | 2009 |
| The utility of the SAT I and SAT II for admissions decisions in California and the nation JL Kobrin, WJ Camara, GB Milewski Rethinking the SAT, 251-276, 2013 | 57 | 2013 |
| The SAT® as a Predictor of Different Levels of College Performance. Research Report No. 2006-3. JL Kobrin, RS Michel College Board, 2006 | 49 | 2006 |
| Contextual factors associated with the validity of SAT scores and high school GPA for predicting first-year college grades JL Kobrin, BF Patterson Educational Assessment 16 (4), 207-226, 2011 | 47 | 2011 |
| The Validity of the SAT for Predicting Cumulative Grade Point Average by College Major. EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin, BF Patterson, KD Mattern College Board, 2011 | 46 | 2011 |
| The Validity of the SAT for Predicting Cumulative Grade Point Average by College Major. EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin, BF Patterson, KD Mattern College Board, 2011 | 46 | 2011 |
| The cognitive equivalence of reading comprehension test items via computerized and paper-and-pencil administration JL Kobrin, JW Young Applied Measurement in Education 16 (2), 115-140, 2003 | 46 | 2003 |
| An alternative presentation of incremental validity: Discrepant SAT and HSGPA performance KD Mattern, EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin Educational and Psychological measurement 71 (4), 638-662, 2011 | 44 | 2011 |
| The association between SAT prompt characteristics, response features, and essay scores JL Kobrin, H Deng, EJ Shaw Assessing Writing 16 (3), 154-169, 2011 | 42 | 2011 |
| Determining SAT® Benchmarks for College Readiness. Research Notes. RN-30. JL Kobrin College Board, 2007 | 39 | 2007 |
| Academic fit: is the right school the best school or is the best school the right school? KD Mattern, EJ Shaw, JL Kobrin Journal of Advanced Academics 21 (3), 368-391, 2010 | 36 | 2010 |
| Does quantity equal quality? the relationship between length of response and scores on the SAT essay. JL Kobrin, H Deng, EJ Shaw Journal of Applied Testing Technology 8 (1), 2007 | 33 | 2007 |
