Follow
Peter Hogg
Peter Hogg
Professor of Radiography, University of Salford
Verified email at salford.ac.uk
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: overview and perspectives
GP Yan, L Robinson, P Hogg
Radiography 13, e5-e19, 2007
2412007
Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study
CE Mercer, P Hogg, R Lawson, J Diffey, ERE Denton
The British journal of radiology 86 (1022), 20110596, 2013
802013
The role of 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT bone scans in the diagnosis of metastatic bone disease from breast and prostate cancer
RK Kulshrestha, S Vinjamuri, A England, J Nightingale, P Hogg
Journal of nuclear medicine technology 44 (4), 217-222, 2016
662016
Research in our practice—a requirement not an option: discussion paper
T Gambling, P Brown, P Hogg
Radiography 9 (1), 71-76, 2003
642003
Practitioner compression force variation in mammography: A 6-year study
CE Mercer, P Hogg, K Szczepura, ERE Denton
Radiography 19 (3), 200-206, 2013
552013
A UK-wide analysis of trait emotional intelligence within the radiography profession
SJ Mackay, P Hogg, G Cooke, RD Baker, T Dawkes
Radiography 18 (3), 166-171, 2012
542012
Anthropomorphic chest phantom imaging–the potential for dose creep in computed radiography
WK Ma, P Hogg, A Tootell, D Manning, N Thomas, T Kane, J Kelly, ...
Radiography 19 (3), 207-211, 2013
522013
Breast composition: measurement and clinical use
EU Ekpo, P Hogg, R Highnam, MF McEntee
Radiography 21 (4), 324-333, 2015
502015
A 6-year study of mammographic compression force: Practitioner variability within and between screening sites
CE Mercer, K Szczepura, J Kelly, SR Millington, ERE Denton, R Borgen, ...
Radiography 21 (1), 68-73, 2015
482015
Digital mammography
P Hogg, J Kelly, C Mercer
Springer 1, 1-307, 2015
482015
Creating and validating self-efficacy scales for students
J Kitching, S Cassidy, P EACHuS, P Hogg
Radiologic technology 83 (1), 10-19, 2011
472011
Fact or fiction: an analysis of the 10 kVp ‘rule’in computed radiography
E Allen, P Hogg, WK Ma, K Szczepura
Radiography 19 (3), 223-227, 2013
452013
10 kVp rule–an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom imaging study using a CR system: impact on image quality and effective dose using AEC and manual mode
L Lança, L Franco, A Ahmed, M Harderwijk, C Marti, S Nasir, J Ndlovu, ...
Radiography 20 (4), 333-338, 2014
402014
The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full‐field digital mammography units
IHR Hauge, P Hogg, K Szczepura, P Connolly, G McGill, C Mercer
Medical physics 39 (1), 263-271, 2012
402012
Preparedness for clinical practice–perceptions of graduates and their work supervisors
SJ Mackay, AC Anderson, P Hogg
Radiography 14 (3), 226-232, 2008
392008
Radiographers’ perspectives’ on Visual Grading Analysis as a scientific method to evaluate image quality
H Precht, J Hansson, C Outzen, P Hogg, A Tingberg
Radiography 25, S14-S18, 2019
362019
A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection
RJI Sweeney, SJ Lewis, P Hogg, MF McEntee
The British journal of radiology 91 (1082), 20170611, 2018
362018
Increasing source to image distance for AP pelvis imaging–Impact on radiation dose and image quality
J Tugwell, C Everton, A Kingma, DM Oomkens, GA Pereira, ...
Radiography 20 (4), 351-355, 2014
362014
Health behavioural theories and their application to women's participation in mammography screening
O Lawal, F Murphy, P Hogg, J Nightingale
Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences 48 (2), 122-127, 2017
352017
ROI-based reversible watermarking scheme for ensuring the integrity and authenticity of DICOM MR images
AF Qasim, R Aspin, F Meziane, P Hogg
Multimedia Tools and Applications 78, 16433-16463, 2019
342019
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20