| Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety S Erdem, D Rigby, A Wossink Food Policy 37 (6), 661-670, 2012 | 115 | 2012 |
| Including opt-out options in discrete choice experiments: issues to consider D Campbell, S Erdem The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 12, 1-14, 2019 | 82 | 2019 |
| Position bias in best‐worst scaling surveys: A case study on trust in institutions D Campbell, S Erdem American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (2), 526-545, 2015 | 63 | 2015 |
| Accounting for attribute‐level non‐attendance in a health choice experiment: Does it matter? S Erdem, D Campbell, AR Hole Health economics 24 (7), 773-789, 2015 | 58 | 2015 |
| Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment S Erdem, C Thompson BMC health services research 14, 1-14, 2014 | 54 | 2014 |
| Investigating heterogeneity in the characterization of risks using best worst scaling S Erdem, D Rigby Risk Analysis 33 (9), 1728-1748, 2013 | 39 | 2013 |
| Elimination and selection by aspects in health choice experiments: prioritising health service innovations S Erdem, D Campbell, C Thompson Journal of health economics 38, 10-22, 2014 | 33 | 2014 |
| Consumers' preferences for nanotechnology in food packaging: A discrete choice experiment S Erdem Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (2), 259-279, 2015 | 29 | 2015 |
| The influence of mortality reminders on cultural in‐group versus out‐group takeaway food safety perceptions during the COVID‐19 pandemic S McCabe, S Erdem Journal of Applied Social Psychology 51 (4), 363-369, 2021 | 15 | 2021 |
| Who do UK consumers trust for information about nanotechnology? S Erdem Food Policy 77, 133-142, 2018 | 15 | 2018 |
| Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques S Erdem, D Campbell The European Journal of Health Economics 18, 1107-1123, 2017 | 10 | 2017 |
| Including opt-out options in discrete choice experiments: issues to consider. The Patient–Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 12: 1-14 D Campbell, S Erdem | 5 | 2019 |
| Who is most responsible for ensuring the meat we eat is safe? S Erdem, D Rigby, A Wossink | 5 | 2010 |
| People’s preferences for self‐management support CP Iglesias Urrutia, S Erdem, YF Birks, SJC Taylor, G Richardson, ... Health services research 57 (1), 91-101, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| The effect of front-of-pack nutrition labelling formats on consumers’ food choices and decision-making: merging discrete choice experiment with an eye tracking experiment S Erdem, T McCarthy | 4 | 2016 |
| Attribute-level non-attendance in a choice experiment investigating preferences for health service innovations S Erdem, D Campbell, AR Hole International Choice Modelling Conference 2013, 2013 | 4 | 2013 |
| Measuring time preferences using stated credit repayment choices H Li, D Campbell, S Erdem Journal of Quantitative Economics 20 (1), 43-67, 2022 | 3 | 2022 |
| Using a Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Consumers’ WTP for Health Risk Reductions Achieved By Nanotechnology in the UK S Erdem, D Rigby | 3 | 2011 |
| Investigating the effect of restaurant menu labelling on consumer food choices using a field experiment S Erdem British Food Journal 124 (11), 3447-3467, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| Using discrete-choice experiments to elicit preferences for digital wearable health technology for self-management of chronic kidney disease VS Gc, CP Iglesias, S Erdem, L Hassan, N Peek, A Manca International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 38 (1), e77, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
Danny CampbellUniversity of StirlingDirección de correo verificada de stir.ac.uk
